On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Rutledge Shawn <shawn.rutle...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: >> Being able to do 500+items rectangles in one frame is decent, but not >> awesome. Being able todo 130 text items in one frame, is less than ideal, >> given that we often use several text items per cell in a list or table. Text >> is probably the most important UI element we have. Being able to do 10 >> buttons is, well, unfortunate :) If we look at Button, we see that it is a >> fairly complex QML beast. Hierarchy is >> >> Button -> BasicButton -> Control -> FocusScope >> >> and there are quite a bit of stuff on every level, including the dynamic >> style handling which will in turn create a StyleItem. >> >> And keep in mind that even though this isn’t the most high-end mac, it is >> sitll a pretty decent computer, Qt is supposed to run on much worse hardware >> than this. >> >> — >> >> There have been a few changes going into 5.5 which make these numbers better >> than 5.4, but I still think we got quite a ways to go. > > That’s very interesting. > > Do you think it was ever better in past versions?
I'm glad you asked: http://rburchell.com/QtQuickPerformance.pdf > What do you think we should do about it? Mainly focus on trying to create > fewer objects, or is there still a lot of headroom for making the creation > more efficient? Is creation expensive because of constructor code, making > too many signal/slot connections, or something else? I think there's plenty that can be done, because it *used* to be better. We should aim for matching the performance we used to have at the very least, ideally, for exceeding that. I'd say that one very particular case that needs attention is text performance. It's pretty bad. As for why, specifically, it's slow, I did some profiling in the past, but I don't have those results now. I plan to spend some time on that, maybe on the weekend, and send some more information once that's done. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development