Thiago Macieira wrote: >> What macro works for multiple versions of Qt? >> Why should everyone define such a macro themselves in their code? How >> about contributing it back to qglobal.h? What would it be called? And to >> bring this full circle, how about swapping the semantic of the old and >> new macros? >> >> I'm sure you considered not making the SIC change and creating a new >> macro instead. Why did you decide for the SIC? > > Two main reasons: > > 1) it improves existing code, since we can get rid of some #ifdefs > > 2) it allows us avoid CI integration errors because no one compiled in > release mode before submitting
I'm sure it's as obvious to you as it is to me that both of those would be solved in a SIC way by a new macro. Q_CHECKED_ASSERT or similar. It's not a good argument for the SIC. Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development