31.07.2015, 10:43, "Sylvain Pointeau" <sylvain.point...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Gerhard Scheikl <g.sche...@avibit.com> wrote: >> I found a nice image on stackoverflow: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9387610/what-xml-parser-should-i-use-in-c >> >> If it is true, then our choice would be xerces because libxml2 doesn't have >> an >> exact DOM/SAX API compliance. > my opinion is that libxml is the best xml library, it is everywhere and it is > very fast. I used libxml multiple times to parse big files, and this is just > the best library for xml / xslt > > I personally don't care so much for the exact DOM/SAX API compliance, and > furthermore this problem disappears because you implement a Qt API on top.
I use pugixml. It's lightning fast because it makes no string copies and doesn't convert input to UTF16 (unlike Qt's parsers) -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
