On Monday 27. July 2015 14:24:27 Gerhard Scheikl wrote: > On Monday 27 July 2015 09:47:34 Knoll Lars wrote: > > With the old QXmlReader or with QXmlStreamReader? > > We are currently using QXmlSchemaValidator for the validation. > > > QXmlStreamReader is not a SAX parser. > > But the approach is very similar. Both are "iterative". :) >
I believe the confusion comes from the fact you said QtXml instead of QtXmlPattern. This is an entierly different module. (Maybe the bug you are talking about is https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-12534 which indeed is quite bad.) IMHO, having another backend than the current unmaintained one would indeed be preferable. The problem is that we have to be sure we can do everything that the current one is doing without too many regressions. And still working on all supported platforms. This can be a lot of work. -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com - http://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development