On Friday 14 August 2015 02:13:36 Jake Petroules wrote:
> However, I've submitted a patch which would resolve the CI issue in question
> (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/123073/). Do we want to push that
> through along with some of the currently posted patches before the lockdown
> happens?
Unless it's some extremely unlikely coincidence, your patch solves one of the
three issues found during my integration. The other two would remain:
FAIL! : tst_QGraphicsProxyWidget::childPos(7-) Compared doubles are not the
same (fuzzy compare)
Actual (proxyChildPosX): 100
Expected (expectedXPosition): 0
FAIL! : tst_LargeFile::fillFileSparsely(block[32] @4294967296)) Compared
values are not the same
Actual (largeFile.write(block)): -1
Expected ((qint64)blockSize): 4096
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
