On Friday 16 October 2015 19:03:18 Marc Mutz wrote: > The problem is that I feel we can't wait for string_view because we already > drown in QString equivalents. Plus, we'd get the usual replies if anyone > suggested to use std::string_view as such a fundamental Qt type. Naturally, > QStringView would trivially convert to and from std::u16string_view with no > runtime overhead (unless compiler writers ruin the concept of string_view > by implementing it as (T*, size_t) in one compiler and (T*, T*) in > another....)
The conversion from one to the other is one instruction. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
