On Thursday 17 March 2016 08:37:38 Knoll Lars wrote: > On 17/03/16 00:14, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" <development- [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >On quarta-feira, 16 de março de 2016 21:43:00 PDT Knoll Lars wrote: > >> Good initiative. I think this is the right idea. Let's put the coding > >> guidelines into .qdoc files after having a decision on the ML. > > > >As I said, there is already a change by Marc that adds this file (it was > >an .md instead of a .qdoc). > > > >I can't find it, though. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/142782/
This document is about the level of C++ support required by that release of Qt. I don't want it to be about formatting, too, other than pointing out bugs in implementation that we need to work around. Formatting could/should be a separate document, because it's more stable. I still plan to put all of the prose in that change into a config test for 5.7, so we also programmatically check it. If qdoc would start looking into config.tests, too, that might be a reson to change from markdown (which others have preferred independently, too, incidentally) to qdoc format and create the list from the config test. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
