On Saturday 04 June 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sábado, 4 de junho de 2016, às 22:20:14 BRT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > > 2. Is it OK to use "QtWebKit" name for this project, and if yes, how > > should it be versioned? > > > > Pros: > > * It is a drop-in replacement for QtWebKit, > > Please don't. You can use the same soname if you are binary compatible, but > please call the module / project something different to indicate that it's > different from the previous effort. We cannot give the impression that it > is a continuation if it doesn't get as wide support as the old one had and > feature parity. > I would suggest the name WebKitQt, that would fit the names of other upstream WebKit ports.
`Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development