On quinta-feira, 7 de julho de 2016 09:10:50 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations, > > I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change. > > We have The Chief on record saying that we should use whatever is most > efficient internally (https://codereview.qt-project.org/114327 comment > from 2015-06-15), and you agreeing (ibid, 1st @ 2015-06-16).
He hasn't chimed in on this discussion, which makes me wonder if he's out for vacations. > So from my pov, the only question is whether we stay with Option 4 or relax > to Option 5, and I'm fine with either. For me, it's whether we stay with 4 or write the classes from Option 3. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development