On miércoles, 7 de diciembre de 2016 02:23:15 ART Kevin Kofler wrote: > Thiago Macieira wrote: [snip] > > I wonder: do we want a different ELF version for the QPA bits, other than > > Qt_5_PRIVATE_API? > > IMHO, we want a versioned one, but in both cases. Distinguishing between QPA > and other private bits does not really matter though, if they have the same > (lack of) ABI guarantees.
The same could be said from the Debian side. If you find it useful to have a different ELF version we will just need to adjust a couple of scripts, but as long as we can determine that those are private symbols, everything is fine. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
