On Montag, 16. Januar 2017 12:57:01 CET Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 16.01.2017, 12:34, "Olivier Goffart" <oliv...@woboq.com>: > > On Samstag, 14. Januar 2017 17:28:01 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I'm trying to contribute by making QMetaObject::invokeMethod() take > >> function pointers instead of function names. > >> > >> I've come up with something that works by looking at the code of > >> QMetaObject::invokeMethod, QObject::connect and QMetaObject::activate. > > > > Thanks for your contribution. > > > > What's the use case for this function? For direct call you better of > > calling the function directly, and the equivalent of QueuedConnection can > > be achieved with QTimer::singleShot. > > QTimer::singleShot creates temporary QSingleShotTimer object, which does not > seem to be efficient solution if same method needs to be called a lot of > times in QueuedConnection way.
Yes, that's true: The string based method is optimized for 0ms timeout, but not the function pointer one. The function pointer version could be optimized for 0 timer the same way that the string version of QTimer::singleShot does. (Well, not exactly the same way currently as we cannot use QMetaObject::invokeMethod yet.) -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - https://woboq.com - https://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development