On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote: > However, you seem to be talking about *release* 5.x.0 rather than the > *branch* of that name, so I'm not really clear on what you're talking > about. > i don't know how you arrived at this conclusion, but it isn't relevant to my reasoning anyway.
> > we could suppress the changelog enforcement for example by standardizing > > my "amends <sha1>." lines in the commit messages. if the reference is to > > a commit which has not been tagged yet, we know that users won't find it > > interesting. > > I have never heard of these amends <sha1> lines; where are they > explained ? > git log --author=oswald > In any case, users may find a change interesting even if there is no > specific earlier commit that can be pinned down [...] > unsurprisingly, i think that the correct fallback in case of a missing reference is assuming that the commit relates to a tagged commit (if it's even a fix at all) and therefore complaining about a missing changelog. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development