On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:08:21PM +0000, Jake Petroules wrote: > We never said we will continue to use QtScript *as-is*. When I said JSC, I was > talking about a modern version of JSC from the WebKit trunk, not the last copy > of it that was bundled with QtScript. For standards-compliance & features, JSC > is quite attractive as it's the most advanced.
I don't think compliance to a standard carries a lot of weight in a context where said language is typically used in half-line stanzas embedded in a non-standardized container format. Thinking about it, *none* of the original reasons to use JS as embedded scripting language carries a lot of weight as far as I am concerned. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
