On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 05:50:35 PDT Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Robin Burchell wrote: > > To me, it's implicit that each release will ideally have improvements in > > terms of stability, so I think that there's less point in focusing on > > them, unless they are a major newsworthy item: something like "sorry we > > released 1.0.0 yesterday, but it turns out that feature foo was totally > > broken, have 1.0.1 today to fix that" would be newsworthy, but "we fixed > > a crash that has existed for the past 3 years" - less so, but that's my > > own personal view. > > the trolltech policy was to always add a changelog entry when there was a > proper bug report. that seems reasonable, because there is (or at least > was) somebody waiting for that fix.
Which is why, as a maintainer, I did a quick git log --grep=Task-number and checked which bug fixes did not have a changelog entry but should have had (not all needed it). (I think there's a way to make git do the skipping, but I'd have to look at the manual) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development