Hi,
I find the easiest way to find the last successful integration for example for
qt5.git dev is this:
(1) Go to http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt5.git/ and pick the dev branch
(2) Click on the last commit in the branch
(3) Click on the "Change-Id" link or paste the commit sha1 into the Gerrit
search field
(4) At the bottom of the change in Gerrit you can find a link to
https://testresults.qt.io/ with more details about the actual integration and
what other changes it was tested together with
(https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1510549095 in this
case).
The git repo is our source of truth, and from there it's easy to get back to
gerrit and then the CI. All of the above steps can also be done entirely in a
CLI way by using Gerrit's ssh query interface.
Simon
________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces+simon.hausmann=qt...@qt-project.org> on
behalf of Adam Treat <adam.tr...@qt.io>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 5:47:41 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] COIN failures on dev
Whenever I discover something seemingly broken in an area of code I'm
unfamiliar with I first suspect I don't understand something...
Right now I'm looking for the last successful dev branch integration on
qt5 supermodule and I can not find it. I've gone back to before
Thanksgiving.
Can this possibly be correct??
Where is the dashboard showing the last successful integration for a
given branch?
On 12/11/2017 11:24 AM, Adam Treat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the past few business days we've all witnessed failures on dev
> branch like this: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/213309/
>
> Seems that something broke with provisioning on macOS or something. I
> see this https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214045/ attempt to fix,
> but that is also failing to integrate due to seemingly unrelated reasons.
>
> I'm disturbed that I haven't seen any widely shared communication
> about this, how it broke, what is being done to fix, or what can be
> done to stop it in the future.
>
> Things seem really broken with our CI system in general. I wonder that
> this isn't the normalization of deviance. Has the project just given
> up and regards this as standard operating procedure?
>
> - Adam
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
