I don't understand how can Qt just let QBS die like that. It's absolutely fantastic. I really hope open source development happens becuase ti will be bloody shame if ti doesn't :(
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:54 AM Ola Røer Thorsen <o...@silentwings.no> wrote: > >> > >> We have been developing Qbs over the last years, and as such are >> > >> committed to it for some more time. We are planning on another >> feature >> > >> release in the first quarter of next year and will support it in Qt >> > >> Creator for at least another year. >> > > This is _really_ disappointing news. I'd be happy to see qmake go, now > this. > > We (at work, commercial Qt license) recently ported a rather big build > system to Qbs, replacing qmake and scons. We now have good IDE integration > for all our projects in QtCreator, both the Qt-based applications as well > as pure C/C++-based projects for desktop, embedded Linux and "bare metal" > embedded. We spent some time debugging and reporting/fixing bugs in Qbs > too. Now with Qbs 1.12.0 we're having good and stable results. Incremental > builds are _very_ fast. Project files are easy to set up, read and extend, > even with custom code generation rules, things we never were able to do > with (even undocumented) qmake. It's really impressive. > > Well I guess all that was for nothing, let's rewrite the build system next > year again, and make really sure not to embrace new Qt technologies so fast > next time. > > Cheers, > Ola > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development