Wow, hold on for a minute. I’ve been using a qbs package as a standalone leaf package (sudo aptitude install qbs) to build my projects. Also, self-built QBS package was commercially used to create several Debian packages back in 2013.
> 30 окт. 2018 г., в 18:18, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > <perezme...@gmail.com> написал(а): > > El martes, 30 de octubre de 2018 13:52:18 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen escribió: >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:10:27AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Is it packaged in a Linux distribution? My requirements also included >>> continuously packaged for 2 years in at least 3 Linux distributions, >>> at the time of the Qt switch to the particular buildsystem. >> >> it's been packaged for much longer and by more distros already, because >> it's part of qt creator for quite a while. i don't know whether all of >> them ship it as separate packages already, but the official messaging >> from us was that they *should*. > > The first Debian upload was: > > qbs (1.2.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Initial release (closes: #745095). > > -- Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@gmail.com> Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:28:44 +0400 > > As of today, a little more than 4 years, it has only two users (reverse > dependencies): qt creator and dewall. > > Considering yesterday's announce and the fact that qt creator ships a bundled > copy the only package stopping us from removing qbs from the archive is > dewall, so I don't think it will stay in the archive for much longer. > > > -- > The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux. > Anonymous > > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development