On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:44:03PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 14:33:41 PDT NIkolai Marchenko wrote: > > Tbh, we wouldn't if this post hasn't almost stated that you are pulling the > > plug. > > As I saw it: qbs folks have finally started doing the correct thiing (that > > is - tutorials) and what you are speaking of had a chance to happen. > > But as of right now no amount of tutorials will change the fact that > > reluctance to swtich to a new system will become reluctance to change to a > > _stillborn_ system. > > Then reverse that with action. It's an open source project and people can > contribute to it, inside the Qt Project governance even. TQtC employees can > contribute in their free time too, maybe even in Creative Fridays if they > still have that. > > [...] > > > Oh, and also, maybe we need a separate post about this issue: "Should QBS > > stay?" > > Sure, go ahead and gather your contributors. I still think qbs was/is a great > idea. It's only lacking maturity.
Ok. Let me bite. In <2217724.thNANPicTR@tjmaciei-mobl1> you stated "Ossi and several others are right that qbs was never given a proper chance. It hasn't" Above you stated that contributions to QBS could even happen inside the Qt Project. Active part of "giving [some piece of software] a chance" is promoting it on some webpage. Where would a QBS-promoting webpage be located? qt-project.org ? Oops. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
