IMHO, it should be a Qt6 feature. It’s awesome.
However, I liked the idea (is it deprecated or what?) of a template method
template<typename T, typename Args…>
std::observer_ptr<QObject>
qMakeChild(gsll::not_null<std::observer_ptr<QObject>> parent, Args… args)
{
return parent->adoptChild(std::make_unique<T>(args));
}
With that method, you don’t need to implement stuff like
QLibrary::QLibrary(QParentPtr<QObject *> parent, const QString &fileName),
You just need to split ctor into safe and unsafe versions and deprecate unsafe.
Maybe I’m asking too much, but it would be nice get rid of raw pointers
completely switching to pair std::unique_ptr/std::observer_ptr
> 3 мая 2019 г., в 19:22, Daniel Teske <q...@squorn.de> написал(а):
>
> So, who thinks that this is something that ought to be a Qt6 feature?
>
> And who wants to actually help make that happen?
>
> daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
