On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, 18:11 Jedrzej Nowacki, <jedrzej.nowa...@qt.io> wrote:
> On Saturday, June 15, 2019 6:37:24 PM CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 June 2019 02:18:28 PDT Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > > > You can download a CMake static binary (https://cmake.org/download/) > that > > > > (...) > > > > I would prefer that our requirements be present in Linux distributions we > > declare are supported build environments. If nothing else, our CI will > > benefit from this. > > Let's not pull CI into it. It already Wow! Let's not pull in the system which only goal is to validate the "supported platforms" promise, is it what you mean? If I need a special cmake to build Qt, then this should be shipped as part of Qt itself, another third-party source tree. And then it means that I will need to build qt's build system. In other words, I'll have to bootstrap Qt build system. I thought that it was a big no-no. The main argument to ditch qmake and qbs... Chris covers installation of the cmake in > order to test wip/cmake branch ( > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt5.git/tree/coin/ > provisioning/common/linux/cmake_linux.sh?h=wip/cmake > <https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt5.git/tree/coin/provisioning/common/linux/cmake_linux.sh?h=wip/cmake> > ) > > Cheers, > Jędrek > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development