> > Can Qt set a "no private destructor!" rule? > > No. > > Private destructors have a purpose.
Would a workable re-wording be "always provide a public means of destruction"? To be clear, I am not sure what the actual issue is, why it's private, or why shiboken can't handle it. In the immediate case PyQt provides the class so there seems to be some way around the issue... _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
