On Wednesday, 21 August 2019 08:18:08 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > Oh, the following is nearly the most optimal: > > > > > > test[u"key"] = u"value”; > > > So that would be utf16, can’t we let test["key"] = “value” assume utf8, ie > u8”foo” without the explicitness?
We can and already do that. But that's not optimal, since the UTF-8 algorithm has a cost. That's why we are not removing QLatin1String: the Latin1 algorithm is as fast as memcpy. The only thing better than that is zero copies. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
