Il 20/12/19 13:54, Vitaly Fanaskov ha scritto:
This is not that easy to use std::* containers because at least the following issues have to be addressed:* Memory management * Binary compatibility * Implementation consistencyYou probably can provide, for example, some allocators, relax compatibility requirements and so on... The question only is whether this is worth doing or not.
I'm not totally sure I understand this point. What do you mean by "memory management"? (Binary compatibility of stdlib is not an issue, and implementation consistency for containers shouldn't really be either).
Personally I tend thinking that this is better to maintain, extend and improve what we already have rather than address the issues listed above. Again, this is just a personal opinion.
It's just a problem of "who does the work", and we've got a terrible track record at that. But I grant that implementing containers is fun, and I'm not doing the work, so I shut up :)
Thanks, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
