On 20/12/19 13:47, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote:
> Just to be devil's advocate, there is... As much as it's fun and
> everything implementing a container, just using std::unordered_map would
> have minimal effort on our side ("someone else's problem", and it's not
> even a random 3rd party, but a mandatory prerequisite for building Qt),I'm not sure the "someone else's problem" argument would go down very well with Qt customers. :-) Using std::* classes in the Qt implementation is not a bad idea, but only as long as their performance is top-notch. Otherwise if Qt just becomes "a convenient wrapper of the STL", people who care most about performance will simply go for the latter. Ciao, Alberto -- http://www.mardy.it - Geek in un lingua international _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
