Il 23/12/19 09:10, Alberto Mardegan ha scritto:
I'm not sure the "someone else's problem" argument would go down very well with Qt customers. :-)
<Devil's advocate> Why not? Why would any user care about _who_ implements QHash internals?
Using std::* classes in the Qt implementation is not a bad idea, but only as long as their performance is top-notch. Otherwise if Qt just becomes "a convenient wrapper of the STL", people who care most about performance will simply go for the latter.
std::unordered_map is just as good or as bad as QHash today, given they use pretty much an identical data structure behind the scenes. That is, I wasn't proposing pessimizing anything. (Sure, not improving it either.)
My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
