On Monday, 24 February 2020 03:07:00 PST Lars Knoll wrote: > > On 21 Feb 2020, at 18:49, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > On Friday, 21 February 2020 08:39:57 PST Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > > >> I’m fine with that, and as communicated by Jani, deprecations can be > >> done > >> even with feature freeze in effect, with approval from module maintainer > >> (up until Beta1; after that only with Lars’ approval). > > > > > > Do note the flip side of the coin: adding a new API to replace the > > overriding. > > Right, it’s a bit more than just deprecating a method. But looking at your > proposal I’m ok with the change for 5.15, if you can get it done quickly.
If it's just a std::function<void(void)> we should be ok. The problem is going to be determining whether std::function is acceptable in 5.15 for all our compilers. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
