Hi, Declarative in 5.15 (5.14?) has public API taking a std::function and that appears to be okay so far :)
Simon > Am 27.02.2020 um 18:53 schrieb Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > > On Monday, 24 February 2020 03:07:00 PST Lars Knoll wrote: >>> On 21 Feb 2020, at 18:49, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> >>> wrote: > >>>> On Friday, 21 February 2020 08:39:57 PST Volker Hilsheimer wrote: >>> >>>> I’m fine with that, and as communicated by Jani, deprecations can be >>>> done >>>> even with feature freeze in effect, with approval from module maintainer >>>> (up until Beta1; after that only with Lars’ approval). >>> >>> >>> Do note the flip side of the coin: adding a new API to replace the >>> overriding. >> >> Right, it’s a bit more than just deprecating a method. But looking at your >> proposal I’m ok with the change for 5.15, if you can get it done quickly. > > If it's just a std::function<void(void)> we should be ok. The problem is > going > to be determining whether std::function is acceptable in 5.15 for all our > compilers. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel System Software Products > > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development