28.02.2020, 21:34, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > On Friday, 28 February 2020 07:28:34 PST Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> If we had to do it over again, it might make sense to follow Python and >> make signals *objects* instead of *methods*. Then the code would look like: >> >> this->emptied.emit(...); > > Binary compatibility issue: if it's a member of the class, it can't be added > or removed without changing the class's size and layout, so it would tie our > hands for future improvements. > > You'd see instead: > > this->emptied().emit(...); > connect(foo, foo->emptied(), ...);
I think it could be a static member as well - there is no real reason for such member to be per-instance in the first place. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
