On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:02:04AM +0200, André Pönitz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:43:33AM +0000, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In dev we've had QVector being an alias for QList for a while now. For > > the 6.0 release this particular topic (QList/QVector) suggests two > > goals (among others): > > > > (1) Use the same type throughout the public API of Qt. > > > > (2) Make it easy for our users to maintain a code base that works > > with Qt 5 and 6. > > > > In the light of those two goals, I think we should keep using QList as > > the type in the public API. I don't think we should do a search and > > replace activity and switch to QVector. In the light of that, I would > > like to propose simply deprecating QVector and stick to QList > > everywhere. > > > > What do you think? > > This would avoid *quite* a bit code churn for user code. > > +1
To refine: +1 for staying with QList as the container of choice, and making QVector an alias for that, but I would not deprecate QVector. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development