On 24/04/2020 07.51, André Pönitz wrote:
So what is left is the question about what is in the name. That question was interestingly enough not present at the begin of the crusade, it only came up after it turned out that blind replacement of QList by QVector wasn't *that* trivial and actually caused performance regressions in real world applications, i.e. the performance argument made against QList wasn't quite as uniformly applicable as initially presented.
Hear, hear! And this is why I keep asking that we not get rid of Qt5 QList (even if we a) call it something else and b) get rid of the sometimes-optimization of direct storage). Sometimes, it *is* the right tool for the job.
-- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
