On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 18:39, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> wrote:
> On Dienstag, 3. November 2020 05:34:02 CET Jason McDonald wrote: > > If an issue is not important enough to get attention within a year, is it > > really P1? > > But how many of those are accepted? P1 is just set on the assumption the > bug > is geniune, for instance reported crashes usually get P1. But if it can't > be > reproduced it might never get accepted. > That's a good point. 708 of the 1175 Open P1s are in the Reported state, i.e. if we're sticking to the defined lifecycle, those bugs are unconfirmed/untraiged. I find this rather worrying, since it seems to suggest that the majority of bugs that our users/customers believe to be P1 aren't getting triaged in a timely manner (or at all in a lot of cases). > > Also many modules are not maintained, is it in a module with an active > maintainer of group? > Clicking around randomly for a few minutes suggests that these are overwhelmingly in modules that aren't marked as inactive. I don't have any other way to tell which modules have active maintainers. > I was more confused when I found P0 that had been open for 10 months. That > wasn't really a P0. > That's also a little worrying. When I was Qt's release manager way back in 2008-10, I always had the list of open P0s open and regularly checked progress because those were the issues blocking the releases I was responsible for. At that time there were periodic discussions of having some automated process to ping the assignees of idle P0s after a short timeout. Cheers, -- Dr. Jason McDonald (macadder on FreeNode)
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development