except when qt7 comes you'll be stuck with versionless qt6 branch that you wouldn't be able to move to qt7 because of aforementioned dependency breakages.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:59 PM Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.ves...@qt.io> wrote: > > > > On 13 Jan 2021, at 12:38, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2021 12:31:50 CET Eric Lemanisser wrote: > >> that's the obvious choice, if it was not already used by qt4. > >> > > Then rename the qt4 repo, it is not actively maintained anymore and only > > stored for history. We couldn't do that when creating qt5 as it was > still > > actively maintained and would break a lot of checkouts, but we could do > it > > now. > > I agree, that seems like the easiest and most future-proof solution. > > Cheers, > Tor Arne > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
