On 19/05/2021 22:41, Tuukka Turunen wrote:
While many are still somewhat tuned in on the IRC channel it is clear that the traffic is very modest. It may be that having another system would work better, or perhaps the mailing lists and other available channels are adequate for the need.

To say it all:

* there's more activity in any given day on IRC rather than on the ML;
* there's still super-important interaction happening on IRC rather than on the ML (like the weekly release meetings); * the IRC channels are actually actively moderated (unlike a certain series of recent episodes on the ML proves).

So, if you want to stretch the "argument" up to this point, you'll just prove that the MLs are not adequate for the need.

My 2 c,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to