On Wednesday, 27 July 2022 05:20:59 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development 
wrote:
> Does this mean that the currently available opensource binary downloads
> (through the official installer) of Qt 5.15(.2) and 6.2 are affected by
> the CVE and will not get fixed?
> 
> Should they just be removed from the online installers?

Follow the same rule as 6.1. If 6.1 is there, then so should 6.2 be. If that 
one is not there, then remove 6.2 too.

There is sense in having access to historical, out-of-support and potentially 
security-vulnerable software, so long as it's clear that is the case.

BTW, this is why we started the discussion on third-parties. If we had 
freetype as a separate DLL, upgrading that one would solve the problem for 
everything.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering



_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
  • ... List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development via Development
    • ... Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
      • ... Andy Shaw
      • ... Thiago Macieira
        • ... Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
          • ... Thiago Macieira
            • ... Scott Bloom
              • ... Thiago Macieira
                • ... Scott Bloom
                • ... Kevin Kofler via Development
            • ... Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
              • ... Volker Hilsheimer
                • ... Albert Astals Cid
                • ... Kevin Kofler via Development

Reply via email to