Hi Tuuka,

By that link I didn't mean QTBUG-102962 exactly, but 23 matching bugs for a
single component (which is not even one of the top-wanted components).
On vanilla 6.2.4, QCamera simply doesn't work on many Android devices. All
these issues were resolved for 6.2.5. Coincident?

> We are no holding back on bug fixes, though.
> so the fix is in Qt 6.3.1
Technically you aren't. But in fact you are!
That is what I called "please stick to unstable, semi-functional versions
of Qt, test them and report bugs".
6.3 brought a bunch of new bugs and regressions, and some of them still
aren't fixed. As for example, look at --
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-98964?jql=text%20~%20%22Binding%20on%20contentItem%20is%20not%20deferred%20as%20requested%20by%20the%20DeferredPropertyNames%20class%20info%20because%20one%20or%20more%20of%20its%20sub-objects%20contain%20an%20id%22
-- (and not only at QTBUG-98964).
Fixed in 6.3.0? Sure it is. But it is still reproducible in dev...
Maybe it is not really important? Well, I personally can live with it.
Until I get a hang/crash report in release due to this issue...

And that's just a single example of many.
Okay, perhaps I should stick back to 6.2.4, keep my eye on commits
picked-up to mysterious 6.2.5 and apply them manually. Thanks,
cherry-picking monkey is a job I was dreaming of!

When I chose Qt for developing my apps, it was "Code less, create more[,
deploy everywhere]".
I was ok with building Qt from sources when you started selling binaries to
your commercial folks. Waste of an hour of my machine power per several
months was not a big price for stability update.
But we definitely didn't choose to be your free testing crowd!


Regards,
Unhappy monkey


пн, 19 сент. 2022 г. в 20:15, Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io>:

> Hi Konstantin,
>
>
>
> I am sorry to hear that you are unhappy with Qt 6.2 moving to the
> commercial-only long-term-support phase with release of Qt 6.2.5.
>
>
>
> We are no holding back on bug fixes, though.
>
>
>
> All applicable bug fixes go to dev and are picked to all active branches.
> The fix to QTBUG-102962 was merged to 6.3 branch at the end of April, so
> the fix is in Qt 6.3.1 released in June, as well as in the latest Qt 6.3.2
> release as well as the soon-to-be released Qt 6.4.0 release.
>
>
>
> Yours,
>
>
>
>                 Tuukka
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of
> Konstantin Ritt <ritt...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 19. September 2022 at 15.46
> *To: *development@qt-project.org <development@qt-project.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Development] Commercial-only 6.2 LTS phase starts:
> Closing the 6.2 branch(es) on 20th April
>
> It is probably the most destructive and annoying thing you did!
>
>
>
> I'll try to rephrase what you said in that announcement: "Dear community,
> please stick to unstable, semi-functional versions of Qt, test them and
> report bugs you've found (for free), so we could better support our
> valuable customers (not you). Your contributions are welcomed (but you have
> to pay some money to us to get any gain from your fixes, unless you're ok
> with sticking to some newer semi-functional version of Qt). Thanks for
> everything you did for Qt project (we don't appreciate that). That's how
> Open Governance works, b???h!"
>
>
>
> Am I exaggerating? Let's briefly look at
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-102962?jql=project%20%3D%20QTBUG%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Multimedia%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%206.2.5
>
>
>
> Okay, you won: I'll buy your commercial license, just to share your
> commercial-only repositories to everyone!
>
>
> Regards,
> Konstantin
>
>
>
>
>
> ср, 20 апр. 2022 г. в 10:01, Tarja Sundqvist <tarja.sundqv...@qt.io>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> With Qt 6.3.0 released and the first patch release (Qt 6.3.1) coming soon,
> it is time to enter the commercial-only LTS phase for Qt 6.2 LTS. All the
> existing 6.2 branches remain publicly visible, but they are closed for new
> commits and cherry-picks. The exception is the Qt WebEngine, which has a
> 3rd party LGPL dependency.
>
>
>
> Closing happens today, 20th April 2022. After this, the cherry-picks go to
> another repository that will be available only for the commercial license
> holders. We will arrange repository access to the commercial license
> holders, so in addition to the official releases, it is possible to use the
> repositories.
>
>
>
> The first commercial-only Qt 6.2.5 LTS patch release is planned to be
> released in May.
>
>
>
> The external module maintainers that have access to the Qt 5.15
> commercial-only repositories, will also have access to the Qt 6.2
> commercial-only repositories. If you notice that you don’t have access even
> if you should have, please contact me (tarja.sundqv...@qt.io) as I am the
> release manager for the commercial-only LTS releases.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tarja Sundqvist
>
> Release manager
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>
>
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to