Hi, The tree model examples seem to invent a custom tree item.
Simple: https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qtwidgets-itemviews-simpletreemodel-example.html Edit: https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qtwidgets-itemviews-editabletreemodel-example.html at https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/examples/widgets/itemviews/simpletreemodel/treeitem.h?h=6.6 and https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/examples/widgets/itemviews/editabletreemodel/treeitem.h?h=6.6 --- Long time ago, I based my projects on these examples, inventing (copying and pasting) these tree items. I wonder whether these examples could instead propagate the use of: 1. QTreeWidgetItem? 2. QStandardItem? It seems that e.g. the QTreeWidgetItem is nearly the same as the Tree Item invented in those examples. So, why reinvent? Do you think that the tree item still has a good use case to exist in those examples? If yes, what is it? If not, could we start propagating QTreeWidgetItem or QStandardItem in those examples instead to avoid reinventing? Thank you in advance. Kind regards, László
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
