> On 17 Dec 2023, at 14:16, Marc Mutz via Development > <development@qt-project.org> wrote: > > On 16.12.23 10:20, apoenitz wrote: >> Recently there were two serious regression on the Qt side due to "just using >> string views" (which would also be formally permitted), and I've seen now a >> patch that changes a map to a hash to avoid part of the porting "work" to the >> new comparison scheme that makes that change not quite "mechanical". > > Sorry, I am not aware of either, and the lack of specificity in the > above makes it impossible to respond in a meaningful way, so I won't try to. > > Thanks, > Marc
Without any more details, let’s continue with the work as scoped for Qt 6.7, e.g. continue rollout to string and smart pointer types, as well as to QModelIndex/QPeristentModelIndex. We need confidence that the framework supports plausible scenarios and learn how to deal with the corner cases, which is better done sooner rather than later. Volker -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
