> On 22 Dec 2023, at 17:48, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
> <development@qt-project.org> wrote:
>
> Il 22/12/23 17:08, Pierre-Yves Siret ha scritto:
>> I wouldn't want a radii grouped property just because of its name.
>> I much prefer writing topLeftRadius: 10 than radii.topLeft: 10.
>> The pedantic latin syntax doesn't help with the readability. Maybe that's
>> just because I am not a native English speaker.
>
>
> It might be pedantic, but here's an excerpt from the docs:
>
>> Individual corner **radii** can be set as well (see below).
>
>
> Anyhow, something like:
>
> borderRadius: { topLeft: 10; bottomRight: 10 }
>
> (or cornerRadius or whatever) fixes the API issue I was mentioning, it's
> discoverable, it's "obvious", has minimal impact (1 property on Rectangle
> instead of 4), and it's also compact to write.
Yes, that’s what I had in mind.
Naming wise I would vote for borderRadius, simply because that name and its
behaviour is well known for most developers and designers from CSS.
cornerRadius could be an alternative (I think Figma uses that name).
Cheers,
Lars
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
