On 29.08.24 17:31, Thiago Macieira wrote: > What I'd like to change is: > - for inline code, where the function's noexceptness is likely to be used in > a > noexcept expression elsewhere and that causes slower code to be used
How does that square with being tool-checkable? That sounds like a very subjective and hand-waving argument that will cause haggling about every patch that uses the rule. > - for out-of-line code, where the precondition is unverifiable anyway (such as > "you've passed a valid pointer") *cough* https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/193707 *cough* -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io> (he/his) Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489 Berlin, Germany www.qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
