Bertrand/all,

Could you also consider doing the same with my user "wkeil" in the JIRA?

I understand nobody sent a monthly report for DeviceMap till yesterday.

One of the shepherd's notes in the wiki says something like

(rvs) The report is missing. This on-n-off seems to continue with the
project. I know thatsome of the mentors are recommending giving it
more time, but it seems like we needto establish some metrics to at
least get the community in shape to do the basics (likereporting and
releasing). Without any kind of forcing function I am not sure what
thefuture for this project really is.

There has not been a report a couple of times in recent months. I did all I
can (especially with the stuff I contributed myself) to get the report out
last month, but except the recent "fork" discussion and a small but
informative presentation last weekend, I did not have that much "striking
news" to undergo the same trouble again this week.

Seems nobody else did? If graduation becomes hard based on such perception
by the PMC, in theory what Reza attempted, could be a path if graduation
failed entirely[?]
We would like to prevent that. Btw. I heard by the OpenDDR team, the pace
may be a bit different, but the project is all but dead. As soon as
something gets committed there, I'll sync, but that must not prevent a
solid way of updating the DeviceMap data either. IMHO that is crucial, the
APIs, especially the ones around W3C DDR are likely to remain as they are
and have been Final at W3C since 2008[?]

Werner

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ...Can we go ahead and spend a little bit of time making sure the JIRA
> system is properly configured and useable for reporting
> > devicemap issues
>
> I've just added user [email protected] to the PMC group of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP so you should have full
> access now - if not please let me know.
>
> > ...the only issues I see is that we need to customize the 'component'
> and 'issue type' fields so they match our product(s).
> > Any idea how we can configure this?
>
> Assuming you now have access to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/DMAP you
> can configure components and issue types there - components are at
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/DMAP/components
>
> IIRC changing issue types is more complicated as that touches the
> workflow, maybe just creating components is good enough.
>
> > Can guests submit issues?
>
> In jira they need to create an account - they can also just post svn
> patches to this list if you don't want accounts.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Reply via email to