As for release, YYYY-MM probably makes sense, beyond that it seems unnecessary, even if some devices are released durinng a "big launch" that is usually not the time they become available in stores.
Werner On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > So I added 2 new properties to the devices, release year and pixel > density. No real motive here other than adding more data. Right, I forgot > to add it to the xml schema definition... good catch. I will get the > definitions in there shortly. > > As for release year vs release month vs release second... release year > just makes sense and it's useable. Remember, defaults are bad and can be > dangerous, so I would caution against tagging devices as being released in > January as a default. > >
