-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
> So I added 2 new properties to the devices, release year and pixel > density. No real motive... The point is not the reason, not the "motive", the point is the manner. We all appear to agree the Vocabulary needs a review and more, better Properties, but let's not use "so I added..." as a method. So, please stop adding properties before we reach consensus on their need, format etc. With regard to release date, which I agree should be added, the YYYY-mm -- it is a standard after all -- appears to be the consensus. So, I have no objections to it being added in that format. [I can provide release dates for existing devices -- where known] I'm not sure about the pixel density. Not so much the need to include it, I can see that, but because of the fact that more 'similar' Properties may be included in the big Data 2.0 update which is planned. So, I'd say, if you must, include it [how many devices out of a total of...] keeping in mind that its name and format [why not include the unit of measure, for example] may change for 2.0. So : Release date : yes please : YYYY-mm Pixel density : yes...but better wait for 2.0 esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUBkjKAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcZ3EH/jdNEftbHuD5B2vbiTrNaJ5m BSzqvudSCC0PaMA58pi4xV0zn9EcuxmdkOu2zcy915hWTCk7KE97lhiyYLptFGnG Rdzt6aPgLnf8wkH53daFaYCAbkLWPdeBmiOBtn9iN215LOo6d0bDbKSE4JqCxt3j rWsGD49jr6T+VyRXBScWkjLIA0d1zDdzyRoZTh3kc2YMrYL1+WTAzXfpc0mYCV4q pTSTIcHe1nbiJKvikuTZTCEiYyUGw2I0LXbl2a0KcfolbPr0amw38XJYoZEOl3G1 IjR8Jagr/OAiOmlqL/prxflA3ISGIfIw2QUEnNBQPWrM+dH6nlYpv63Lj78JG2M= =P44+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
