On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:50:35PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > We've got two competing approaches here. For reg and interrupts, the > proposal on the table that we talked about at LPC is to do reg-names > and interrupts-names so as to preserve the existing semantics of the > reg and interrupts properties. For gpios we're using the binding > "<name>-gpios" for named gpio references. There isn't the same > pressure to preserve existing bindings in that case. I'm okay with > either approach, providing that "-regulator" is encoded into the name.
I think I prefer the latter but I'm probably not too fussed. I'd rather use something like -supply for these just on the basis that you don't always connect things to regulators (for example, speaker supplies are generally attached direct to the battery). _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
