On Friday 16 September 2011 04:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:50:35PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
We've got two competing approaches here. For reg and interrupts, the
proposal on the table that we talked about at LPC is to do reg-names
and interrupts-names so as to preserve the existing semantics of the
reg and interrupts properties. For gpios we're using the binding
"<name>-gpios" for named gpio references. There isn't the same
pressure to preserve existing bindings in that case. I'm okay with
either approach, providing that "-regulator" is encoded into the name.
I think I prefer the latter but I'm probably not too fussed.
I'd rather use something like -supply for these just on the basis that
you don't always connect things to regulators (for example, speaker
supplies are generally attached direct to the battery).
Ok, I'll go with <name>-supply then.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
