On Friday 02 March 2012, Grant Likely wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c
> > @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void __init kirkwood_nand_init_rnb(struct mtd_partition
> > *parts, int nr_parts,
> >
> > /*****************************************************************************
> > * SoC RTC
> >
> > ****************************************************************************/
> > -void __init kirkwood_rtc_init(void)
> > +static void __init kirkwood_rtc_init(void)
>
> This undoes the code changed in the previous patch. If you reorder the
> patches then
> this change goes away in both.
>
That would break bisection because you end up with two rtc devices after this
patch without first moving out the kirkwood_rtc_init into board-dt.c
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
