Am Sonntag 04 März 2012, 23:27:10 schrieb Jason: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:48:17PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sunday 04 March 2012, Michael Walle wrote: > > > in my older patch series i flagged all converted devices with two > > > > > > compatibility names. Eg: > > > { .compatible = "marvell,orion5x-rtc", }, > > > { .compatible = "marvell,kirkwood-rtc", }, > > > > > > IMHO marvell,rtc is i little too general, i guess marvell won't have > > > only one rtc ;) > > > > > > Other opinions? > > > > Being specific is certainly good, and it may also be a good idea to > > list the first one it's compatible with in the device tree source. > > > > So the device tree for a 88F6281 soc could list > > > > compatible = "marvell,88f6281-rtc", "marvell,kirkwood-rtc", > > "marvell,orion-rtc"; > > I'll go ahead and make this style of change throughout. I assume > "marvell,88f6281-rtc" would only be for SoC internal devices? eg, the spi > driver wouldn't follow that convention. I'll see if I can dig up a part > number on it.
following the filename spi-orion.c i guess it should use 'marvell,orion-spi'. -- Michael _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss