On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 22:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Well, presumably someone is calling irq_set_irq_type() asking explicitly > for IRQ_TYPE_NONE. The code will now (as it always used to before David's > change) do exactly what you ask this to: it will ask the type to be set > to none. > > If you don't want to set the type to none, don't call the interface asking > for that to happen.
I think part of the idea with NONE is to use it as "reset that interrupt to the "default" setting, whatever that means ... Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
