No functional change, just to make the code a bit more uniform and
remove wrapped lines.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>
---
drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c
index b3f8dda..008022c 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6040-irq.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static irqreturn_t twl6040_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
int twl6040_irq_init(struct twl6040 *twl6040)
{
- int cur_irq, ret;
+ int i, nr_irqs, ret;
u8 val;
mutex_init(&twl6040->irq_mutex);
@@ -148,21 +148,20 @@ int twl6040_irq_init(struct twl6040 *twl6040)
twl6040->irq_masks_cache = TWL6040_ALLINT_MSK;
twl6040_reg_write(twl6040, TWL6040_REG_INTMR, TWL6040_ALLINT_MSK);
+ nr_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(twl6040_irqs);
/* Register them with genirq */
- for (cur_irq = twl6040->irq_base;
- cur_irq < twl6040->irq_base + ARRAY_SIZE(twl6040_irqs);
- cur_irq++) {
- irq_set_chip_data(cur_irq, twl6040);
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(cur_irq, &twl6040_irq_chip,
+ for (i = twl6040->irq_base; i < twl6040->irq_base + nr_irqs; i++) {
+ irq_set_chip_data(i, twl6040);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &twl6040_irq_chip,
handle_level_irq);
- irq_set_nested_thread(cur_irq, 1);
+ irq_set_nested_thread(i, 1);
/* ARM needs us to explicitly flag the IRQ as valid
* and will set them noprobe when we do so. */
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
- set_irq_flags(cur_irq, IRQF_VALID);
+ set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID);
#else
- irq_set_noprobe(cur_irq);
+ irq_set_noprobe(i);
#endif
}
--
1.7.8.6
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
