On 06/13/2012 12:34 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: ... > One other thing: in addition to the device tree binding, this will > all have to be represented in the platform data as well to support > the legacy board definitions currently in the tree. But instead of > adding all of these changes to the patch that converts the code to > a driver, I'm thinking it might be better to split these additions > off into one or more separate patches. Do you have any objections?
So long as git bisect isn't broken for build- or run-time, that's just fine. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
