On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:49:24AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 12:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:23:35AM -0000, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>This patch adds a common clock driver for Silicon Labs Si5351a/b/c
> >>i2c programmable clock generators. Currently, the driver supports
> >>DT kernels only and VXCO feature of si5351b is not implemented. DT
> >>bindings selectively allow to overwrite stored Si5351 configuration
> >>which is very helpful for clock generators with empty eeprom
> >>configuration. Corresponding device tree binding documentation is
> >>also added.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth<sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com>
> >>Tested-by: Daniel Mack<zon...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >[ ... ]
> >
> >>+static inline void _si5351_msynth_set_pll_master(
> >>+   struct si5351_driver_data *drvdata, unsigned char num, int is_master)
> >>+{
> >>+   unsigned long flags;
> >>+
> >>+   if (num>  8 ||
> >>+       (drvdata->variant == SI5351_VARIANT_A3&&  num>  3))
> >>+           return;
> >>+
> >>+   flags = __clk_get_flags(drvdata->msynth[num].hw.clk);
> >>+   if (is_master)
> >>+           flags |= CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> >>+   else
> >>+           flags&= ~CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> >>+   __clk_set_flags(drvdata->msynth[num].hw.clk, flags);
> >>+}
> >>+
> >Unless I am missing something, neither __clk_get_flags() nor the new
> >__clk_set_flags is exported.
> >
> >Did you try to build and load the driver as module ?
> 
> Well, good catch. I didn't try to build v5 as a module, but I guess it
> will fail. But I consider this as something that has to be addressed in
> clk framework itself, not in this patch. There will be other
> clk-providers built as module in the future for sure.
> 
Sure, but you provided the patch to make __clk_set_flags global. To avoid
build failures, I would suggest to either submit a patch to export the
missing functions, or to remove the ability to build the driver as module.

On a side note, do you happen to know anyone working on drivers for Si5319 or
Si5368 ?

Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to